Spotting a row on queer social media, viewers have been revisiting the 2025 Australian animated film Lesbian Space Princess to decide whether its use of the labrys and a violent plot beat cross a line. Who’s represented, how symbols are read, and why it matters to trans and cis lesbians alike are all up for discussion.

  • What’s at stake: The labrys axe is a historic lesbian symbol whose recent cultural usage has sparked debate over inclusion and exclusion.
  • Tone of the scenes: Viewers describe moments in the film as intense and unsettling, with a character’s violent end feeling especially jarring.
  • Creators’ intent: The filmmakers say they debated the flag and symbol’s fraught history before using it to signal inclusive lesbian identity.
  • Practical note: The movie is available to rent or buy in the UK, so you can watch and weigh up representation yourself.
  • Emotional cue: Conversations online are heated but often emphasise care , people want clearer, affirming portrayals rather than coded messages.

Why the labrys matters now , more than a prop

The labrys, a double-headed axe, has been used by lesbians for decades and carries layered meanings, from ancient myth to modern activism. It’s a visual shorthand that can feel empowering, with a chime of toughness and history that’s tactile and recognisable.

But symbols change meaning as communities change. In recent years a version of the labrys flag has been picked up by vocally gender-critical groups, prompting some creators to think twice before including it. That debate explains why viewers scrutinised the film’s choice so closely.

If you’re trying to understand the fuss, look at both history and current usage. A symbol can be reclaimed or co-opted; context , who holds the axe and how the story treats them , matters.

The scene people are talking about , why it feels fraught

A key sequence shows a character attempting to take the labrys and meeting a violent fate, which many found disturbing and read as coded commentary about gender and belonging. For some viewers, that moment felt like an allegory about “stealing” lesbian identity, which is why trans advocates flagged it as problematic.

The filmmakers have said they intended the labrys to be inclusive, and note that a trans woman in the film is able to wield it , a detail some find reassuring. Still, intent and interpretation don’t always line up, and online reactions show how quickly nuance evaporates once a scene touches a live issue.

When you watch, pay attention to framing and language around the scene. Does the film link the failed attempt to take the axe explicitly to gender identity, or do viewers infer that meaning from broader cultural anxieties?

Creators, context and the limits of intent

Filmmakers often argue intent , they meant inclusion, not exclusion , and that matters. According to interviews, the labrys’ inclusion was debated and chosen to signal that all lesbians should be seen, trans women included.

Even so, representation is more than a sentence in a director’s statement. Audiences want on-screen clarity: if a symbol has recent associations with exclusionary politics, textual cues that affirm trans inclusion help defuse misreading. In other words, showing is often more persuasive than saying.

As a viewer, ask whether the story gives trans characters agency and dignity, and whether it avoids tropes that link queerness with punishment or danger.

How symbols shift and what creators can do differently

Cultural shorthand evolves. Flags, logos and props accumulate histories that creators can’t ignore. The safe move is to be explicit: if you mean a symbol to include rather than exclude, build scenes that make that clear rather than leaving it open to interpretation.

Practical tips for storytellers: consult widely in development, cast and write authentically, and provide positive, three-dimensional roles for trans characters. For viewers who care about representation, look for creators’ commentary and who they collaborated with , it often tells you as much as what’s on screen.

What viewers can take away , watch, discuss, decide

If you’re curious, rent the film and make up your own mind. Watch for narrative cues, who’s given voice and agency, and whether the film’s handling of symbols feels thoughtful or careless. Conversations online can be noisy, but they’re also a form of communal meaning-making , disagreeing with care helps.

Ultimately, symbols are only as useful as the stories that surround them. Clearer depiction and intentional inclusion would calm plenty of these debates.

It’s a small cultural moment that shows why representation needs clarity as well as intention.

Source Reference Map

Story idea inspired by: [1]

Sources by paragraph: