Spotlighting a worrying shift: GLAAD’s new Where We Are in Film report shows the big studios released fewer films with LGBTQ+ characters in 2025, why it matters for queer audiences, and what to watch or avoid next.

Essential Takeaways

  • Fewer films included LGBTQ+ characters: 46 of 225 films (20.4%) featured LGBTQ+ characters in 2025, down from 23.6% the year before.
  • Character numbers fell sharply: The total tally dropped to 112 LGBTQ+ characters from 181, meaning smaller, less-visible roles.
  • Bi and trans representation lagged: Bi characters made up only about 10% of LGBTQ+ characters; there were no trans characters counted as distinct from non‑binary in 2025.
  • Family animation blanked out: Major studios released no animated or family films with LGBTQ+ representation that year, leaving younger viewers without on‑screen mirrors.
  • Reporting got more precise: GLAAD now separates leads, significant supporting, supporting and background roles, so fleeting cameos no longer count the same as central figures.

Why this shift matters , visibility isn’t just rhetoric

The first line of the GLAAD report reads like a weather warning for queer audiences: less presence on screen equals fewer stories that reflect everyday lives. That’s not just symbolic , research and lived experience show representation helps reduce stigma and improves wellbeing. According to reporting in the Guardian, the drop is part of a three‑year slide that’s caught activists and viewers off guard. For families and young people looking for themselves in mainstream movies, the gap is tangible and, frankly, irritating.

How GLAAD changed the measurement , better nuance, starker results

GLAAD’s new approach is more granular, which is useful. By separating lead, significant supporting, supporting and background roles, they’ve made it harder for studios to claim progress on the back of token appearances. That clarity means the headline percentage is more meaningful: fewer films contain substantial queer characters, not just blink‑and‑you‑miss‑it cameos. Industry coverage notes that GLAAD has also stepped back from ranking studios publicly, choosing to keep this more as a lobbying and advocacy tool rather than a league table.

Where the shortfalls are most obvious , bi, trans and family films

The statistics get uncomfortable when you look closer. Bisexual characters represented a small fraction of the total queer rolls , roughly one in ten of LGBTQ+ characters in the films surveyed , which doesn’t mirror the community’s real composition. Even more concerning, 2025 recorded zero distinct trans characters in the sample. Coverage from LGBTQ Nation and other outlets flagged that Hollywood appears to have largely stopped making films centred on trans lives, a void that has real cultural consequences. And for parents hoping to introduce inclusive stories early, there were no animated or family titles with LGBTQ+ representation among the major distributors that year.

What studios and audiences are saying , mixed responses

The conversation since GLAAD’s release has been noisy. Some outlets report industry defensiveness, while others amplify activists who see this as a step backwards after years of incremental gains. There’s also debate over whether market forces, political pressure or internal studio caution drove the pullback. Reporting indicates that the 10 largest distributors remain the focus , names you’ll recognise , and GLAAD’s data covers 225 films from those companies. Expect more public pressure and advocacy in response; studios that want better optics will have to invest in stories, not just token casting.

How to find meaningful representation now , practical viewing tips

If you want films where queer characters feel lived‑in rather than tacked on, look for titles where a queer person is billed as a lead or significant supporting character, and check reviews or queer press for depth rather than presence. Independent cinema and streaming platform originals still tend to take more risks, so scan festival winners, queer film outlets and curated lists from LGBTQ+ publications. For parents, seek out indie family projects or short films that centre inclusion, and don’t be shy to support those creators , visibility follows attention and box office or streaming traction.

It's a small change in habits that can help keep meaningful representation on the radar.

Source Reference Map

Story idea inspired by: [1]

Sources by paragraph: