A sweeping investigation by Uncloseted Media has surfaced accounts from LGBTQ people who say they were mistreated by therapists on BetterHelp, the US teletherapy platform. The reported experiences range from dismissive comments about identity to concerns about therapist matching and screening. They raise a pressing question: what protections do clients have when online therapy goes badly?
Essential Takeaways
- More than 80 former users came forward: Uncloseted Media says it identified LGBTQ people who described harmful experiences after reviewing more than 6,000 complaints and social media posts.
- The accounts vary: Some patients reported pressure to suppress their sexuality, dismissals of their gender identity, or advice that didn’t fit their stated needs.
- The claims aren’t findings about every therapist: The accounts are allegations and individual reports, not proof of conduct by all BetterHelp providers.
- Privacy has also drawn regulatory scrutiny: The Federal Trade Commission took action over BetterHelp’s sharing of sensitive consumer information for advertising.
- Training remains a concern: A peer-reviewed study found health-profession trainees reported an average of 4.75 hours of LGBTQ+-specific education.
Reported BetterHelp experiences strike at trust
Therapy depends on trust, so it’s hard to miss the sting in accounts from clients who say they opened up about their identity and were met with criticism or pressure to change. Uncloseted Media’s investigation describes reports from more than 80 former LGBTQ users, gathered through a review of over 6,000 consumer complaints and social media material.
The reported experiences include being told to suppress sexuality, hearing that an identity was “freaky”, being advised to attend church, and having gender identity dismissed. These are accounts attributed to former users, not established findings about every therapist on the service, and that distinction matters when considering a platform with many providers.
The investigation also recounts a lawsuit brought by Jenna Rodarte, who alleges that a therapist she met through BetterHelp responded negatively when she disclosed her sexuality. A public court docket confirms that Rodarte filed a case against BetterHelp, but a complaint records allegations rather than proving them.
How therapist matching can miss the mark
For clients, a matching questionnaire can feel like a promise: share what you need, and the service will help find someone suitable. But the investigation reports complaints from people who say their therapist didn’t meet the preferences or needs they had stated, including requests for LGBTQ expertise.
That gap matters because therapy isn’t a one-size-fits-all service. The investigation cites clinicians’ concerns that matching systems may struggle to account for the detail behind someone’s needs, while reports from Black users describe seeking culturally responsive care and feeling let down by their matches.
A useful first step for anyone choosing online therapy is to ask a prospective therapist directly about their experience with the issues you want to discuss. And if the fit feels wrong, it’s reasonable to raise the concern or seek another provider; comfort and trust are part of the work, not an optional extra.
LGBTQ-specific training remains a concern
The question isn’t only who gets matched, but whether therapists have the preparation to offer affirming care. A peer-reviewed study published in PLOS ONE found that surveyed US health-profession trainees reported an average of 4.75 hours of LGBTQ+-specific education. The researchers described that amount as concerningly low, while noting that their study was exploratory and based on self-reported responses from a limited sample.
The American Psychological Association defines conversion therapy as an effort to change a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity or expression. That definition helps explain why reported pressure to suppress or change an identity raises serious concerns, but the APA resource doesn’t verify any individual account involving BetterHelp.
The practical takeaway is simple: clients may want to ask how a therapist approaches LGBTQ-related concerns, and whether their training fits the support they’re seeking. It’s not a guarantee of a good experience, but clear questions can help set expectations before a session begins.
Privacy and accountability add another layer
Therapy clients share personal information, so trust reaches beyond the session itself. The Federal Trade Commission’s case record concerns BetterHelp’s sharing of sensitive consumer information with third parties for advertising, including information connected to its Pride Counseling service. That regulatory matter is about data handling, not proof of any individual patient’s experience or the quality of therapy they received.
BetterHelp’s response, as reported by Uncloseted Media, is that it expects respectful, professional care and reviews concerns raised about therapist conduct. Meanwhile, the investigation describes a wider accountability challenge: online therapy platforms can sit between clients and independent clinicians, leaving questions about who is responsible when care falls short.
Teladoc’s annual report says changes to laws in Oregon and California may require adjustments to arrangements involving BetterHelp and affiliated clinical entities, and notes that similar legislation was under consideration in other states. For now, the story leaves clients with a clear reminder: read the service’s terms, ask how complaints are handled, and trust your judgement if a provider doesn’t feel right.
Good therapy should make room for who you are, not ask you to explain it away.
Source Reference Map
Story idea inspired by: [1]
Sources by paragraph: