Voters in the 2026 US midterms shifted control of Congress, but the campaign’s focus on transgender people left many wondering who was willing to stand beside them. With Republican groups spending heavily on anti-transgender advertising, the results offer a reminder that political victories and solidarity aren’t the same thing.
Essential Takeaways
- A major political shift: The Associated Press called the Senate for Democrats on election night and the House early the next morning.
- A sizeable advertising campaign: Republican groups spent an estimated $183 million on about 217,000 television ads concerning transgender issues through 25 October.
- The ads weren’t everywhere: The Associated Press reported that spending was concentrated in particular races, and its reporting doesn’t establish whether the messages changed voters’ minds.
- Catholic teaching offers a wider lens: The US bishops’ guidance urges Catholics to consider human dignity, the common good and solidarity when assessing public life.
- Solidarity means more than sympathy: Catholic teaching describes it as a sustained commitment to the good of others, expressed through action.
The election changed Congress, but the campaign left a mark
A campaign can make people feel like a political target even when the election result doesn’t settle what comes next. In the 2026 US midterms, transgender people were at the centre of a large Republican television advertising push, while voters also weighed concerns such as the economy and healthcare.
The Associated Press estimated that Republican groups had spent $183 million on roughly 217,000 television ads about transgender issues by 25 October. The ads were concentrated in certain races, including contests in Texas and Ohio, rather than spread evenly across the country.
Democrats won control of the Senate and House, according to the Associated Press’s account of its election calls. That’s a major shift in Congress, but the result alone can’t tell us what motivated each voter, or whether campaign ads changed anyone’s mind. [2][3]
A campaign message isn’t the same as voter motivation
The advertising put transgender issues in the spotlight, but the available reporting offers no simple verdict on its effect. The Associated Press noted that the messages may have reinforced existing views rather than persuaded voters to change their minds.
That distinction matters. A high-profile campaign theme can shape the atmosphere around an election without explaining the outcome on its own. Nor does a change in congressional control prove that voters have moved beyond single-issue politics.
For transgender people, though, the campaign’s prominence had its own weight. The lead essay describes relief at political gains alongside sadness that some allies appeared to treat transgender dignity as a liability. Those mixed feelings are an important part of the story: a win for one group doesn’t automatically mean everyone feels safer or better represented.
What Catholic social teaching says about politics
The US Conference of Catholic Bishops presents Catholic social teaching as a way to weigh public questions through principles including human dignity, the common good and solidarity. Its guidance asks Catholics to consider candidates and policies in light of the Gospel, while making clear that it doesn’t direct them to support a particular candidate.
That broader framework offers room to consider more than one issue at a time. But the bishops’ guidance doesn’t establish how Catholic voters behaved in the midterms; it sets out principles for political discernment, not evidence about individual voting choices. [4]
The lead essay draws on Pope John Paul II’s account of solidarity as a lasting commitment to the common good, rather than a passing feeling of sympathy. Pope Francis’s writing connects God’s presence in everyday life with solidarity and a desire for justice, while Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical says social and economic progress shouldn’t come at the expense of vulnerable people. [5][6][7]
Solidarity is measured after the applause
So what does solidarity look like in practice? The lead essay’s answer is that compassion must lead to responsibility: listening to people whose dignity is threatened, standing with them when the cost is real, and resisting the urge to treat their rights as politically inconvenient.
That’s a useful test for any community, not just a church or a campaign. The bishops’ guidance emphasises protecting vulnerable people, while John Paul II’s account of solidarity focuses on shared responsibility for the conditions that cause suffering. Together, those ideas ask more of people than good intentions. [4][5]
Transgender people aren’t a campaign theme or an abstract debate. They’re neighbours, family members, colleagues and fellow parishioners, as the lead essay puts it. And when the political spotlight moves on, the everyday question remains: who will still stand beside them?
Closing Line
The real measure of solidarity comes after the election noise fades.
Source Reference Map
Story idea inspired by: [1]
Sources by paragraph: