In a decisive move reflecting corporate commitment to LGBTQ+ rights, Disney shareholders have overwhelmingly voted against a proposal brought forth by the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR) to withdraw Disney from the Human Rights Campaign's (HRC) Corporate Equality Index (CEI).
The proposal, introduced through NCPPR’s Free Enterprise Project (FEP), argued that Disney's participation in the CEI, where the company consistently earns a perfect score, could alienate customers and investors. The FEP described the HRC's criteria as “partisan, divisive, and increasingly radical,” linking their support for transgender rights to what they termed “gender confusion in children.” The proposal further alleged that organisations such as GLSEN, the Trevor Project, and GLAAD promote harmful narratives and engage in “advocating for irreversible surgical procedures on confused teens.”
The proposal also contested Disney’s public opposition to Florida’s "Parental Rights in Education Act," commonly referred to as the "Don't Say Gay" law. NCPPR cited this stance as an example of what they perceive as detrimental corporate activism.
In response, Disney's board of directors recommended that shareholders vote against the proposal, firmly reiterating their ongoing commitment to workplace equality for LGBTQ+ employees. This commitment is demonstrated in their consistent perfect score on the CEI. The preliminary results from the vote showed a minuscule 1% of shares backing the NCPPR's initiative, indicating a strong majority support for the company's current policies and practices.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative is recent and pertains to a current event in 2025, indicating freshness, although specific details about the vote and its formal conclusion might evolve.
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
No direct quotes from specific individuals are provided, making it challenging to verify their origin. However, the narrative outlines positions from organisations, which could be verified through organisational statements or press releases.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative originates from The Fight Mag, which is not among the most well-established or widely recognised publications like BBC or Reuters. However, the facts presented align with typical reporting styles of similar news.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims are plausible and align with ongoing societal debates and corporate policies regarding LGBTQIA+ issues. The rejection of the proposal is consistent with Disney’s previous actions on social issues.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative is generally plausible and recent, reflecting current social and corporate debates. However, without direct quotes or publication from a highly recognised source, caution is advised in assuming absolute accuracy.
